These might link to identical stories, but, for your viewing pleasure:
Lawsuit Proceeds Against NBC Over 'Dateline' Suicide
and
Suit Against 'Predator' Show Advances
Sooner or later, Philip John Eide, Xavier Van Erck, ye too, shall swing from the rope, you boy-loving pedo, you.
He needs to ask himself, was it Karma? Was it Karma that had it turn out that the suicide of this fella, although the vast majority of the show's (and of P-J's, for that matter) focus has been on girl-loving pedos, was the suicide of a boy-lover, like (imo), Philip and Xavier.
You ain't gonna escape yourself, buddy - changing your name ain't gonna change you.
While someone else may pay this particular tab, and lots of others are paying the tab for your running from yourself, the blood of this death is on your hands, and sooner or later, Philip is gonna catch up with Xavier, too.
Municipalities, police departments, and all other manner of governmental units enjoy near total immunity from charges of recklessness, of maliciousness, but uh, oh that's right, neither P-J nor Dateline is one of those.
Thu, Feb. 28th, 2008, 02:27 pm
Effing Shweet
Sat, Mar. 1st, 2008 08:02 pm (UTC)
![[info]](http://www.insanejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif)
littlegirllover
Hmmmmmmm.
Lol...forgive me, if necessary, when I say, "careful dear, your facetiousness may be showing."
Because...I think you know it's really not intense, but just is.
In the event your comment is a sincere one, however, you have my sincere "thank you, I'm glad you think so, even if I do not think its so much intense, as just factual."
You stay and learn enough about me, and you'll figure out why I don't answer personal messages from ones I don't know on here - though I might wish I could.
Plus, or besides, if your age is as you state, there isn't much I can or will say to you, anyway, that is not completely public.
All the same, bestest to you, and thanks for coming by.
Lol...forgive me, if necessary, when I say, "careful dear, your facetiousness may be showing."
Because...I think you know it's really not intense, but just is.
In the event your comment is a sincere one, however, you have my sincere "thank you, I'm glad you think so, even if I do not think its so much intense, as just factual."
You stay and learn enough about me, and you'll figure out why I don't answer personal messages from ones I don't know on here - though I might wish I could.
Plus, or besides, if your age is as you state, there isn't much I can or will say to you, anyway, that is not completely public.
All the same, bestest to you, and thanks for coming by.
Sun, Mar. 2nd, 2008 07:09 pm (UTC)
littlegirllover: but, but, but, I AM nice!
[In response to your message]
A couple things, mkay?
I am nice. And if you stay around, or read enough, you will see it's true. And if you stay long enough that I end up trusting you, you will see it's even more true.
I am not sure about all of these things about [the user you mention]. Yes, she was an lj friend for a very long time, and we were close enough, and I even showed her things, leslita things, for which she was very thankful.
The reason I say "she," is because that is my total understanding of her gender - I've even seen alleged pictures of herself, with her, at that time, girlfriend. So, I am not sure why you use "he" to describe her. Although, yes, I do know she often wished she had a penis, or was a he. Perhaps, she has had her gender actually changed, or prefers that persona entirely at this point, at least on the internet.
The only reason she has not been added back as a friend on my i-j, is that she lists another, dookiedragon, as her friend. I don't like this person muchly, and really don't care for any interaction. Even though there are probably only maybe 5 entries in this journal that are not public.
As to the rest, yes, of course I am skeptical. I am always skeptical. Can you blame me, considering? Because of who I am, I have to be willing to lose anyone who comes through and presents as a friendly to me person - which, yes, you sure did. In determining whether or not you might or might not be truly friendly, or even real, however, I have only two journal entries and your few words to go upon. Further, you don't even show him or her as your friend, nor she you - which you and he or she might have their own reasons for, which is fine of course. Call me paranoid if you like, but I have a suspicion that whole i-j is just a fake one set up by dd, who might be just snowing you, considering. Look who is the only one that has friended that i-j back.
Smiling, believe me, if anyone ever wanted to believe someone like you was for real, it will always be me! - which is why I hedged my bet and thanked you sincerely, both for your comment and for coming by in the first place.
I think if you will consider the kinds of people who consider me an enemy, and the ones I consider enemies, you will understand my carefulness in all things. One needs only to look at the kind of garbage the P-J idiots would say about me (look up littlegirllover on wikisposure, e.g.), the risks they would take with my family, my life, while risking nothing of their own, to understand why trust comes slow for me. They've erroneously linked me with pages to which I have no connection whatsoever, and stated outright that those pages link to child pornography - imagine if they can then add my picture, my location, my real name to that kind of garbage? Then, ultimately disprovable or not, it wouldn't matter, all the damage would be done.
Which is just another reason that I don't yet feel I have the option to respond to your message at your journal, or in a private message, as this crew works with all manner of tracking and hacking stuff, with a total disregard for either truth or consequences.
I'm sure you are smart enough to understand all of this, and therefore, should understand me as well - and so if you are for real, truthful, etc., then you'll stay. Which, in that case, I would really hope you would; if not, please understand, it's not a chance I can take.
And I like your name, too. A neighbor girl once made a pet rock for me with your name emblazoned on the back, in blue. I still have it.
A couple things, mkay?
I am nice. And if you stay around, or read enough, you will see it's true. And if you stay long enough that I end up trusting you, you will see it's even more true.
I am not sure about all of these things about [the user you mention]. Yes, she was an lj friend for a very long time, and we were close enough, and I even showed her things, leslita things, for which she was very thankful.
The reason I say "she," is because that is my total understanding of her gender - I've even seen alleged pictures of herself, with her, at that time, girlfriend. So, I am not sure why you use "he" to describe her. Although, yes, I do know she often wished she had a penis, or was a he. Perhaps, she has had her gender actually changed, or prefers that persona entirely at this point, at least on the internet.
The only reason she has not been added back as a friend on my i-j, is that she lists another, dookiedragon, as her friend. I don't like this person muchly, and really don't care for any interaction. Even though there are probably only maybe 5 entries in this journal that are not public.
As to the rest, yes, of course I am skeptical. I am always skeptical. Can you blame me, considering? Because of who I am, I have to be willing to lose anyone who comes through and presents as a friendly to me person - which, yes, you sure did. In determining whether or not you might or might not be truly friendly, or even real, however, I have only two journal entries and your few words to go upon. Further, you don't even show him or her as your friend, nor she you - which you and he or she might have their own reasons for, which is fine of course. Call me paranoid if you like, but I have a suspicion that whole i-j is just a fake one set up by dd, who might be just snowing you, considering. Look who is the only one that has friended that i-j back.
Smiling, believe me, if anyone ever wanted to believe someone like you was for real, it will always be me! - which is why I hedged my bet and thanked you sincerely, both for your comment and for coming by in the first place.
I think if you will consider the kinds of people who consider me an enemy, and the ones I consider enemies, you will understand my carefulness in all things. One needs only to look at the kind of garbage the P-J idiots would say about me (look up littlegirllover on wikisposure, e.g.), the risks they would take with my family, my life, while risking nothing of their own, to understand why trust comes slow for me. They've erroneously linked me with pages to which I have no connection whatsoever, and stated outright that those pages link to child pornography - imagine if they can then add my picture, my location, my real name to that kind of garbage? Then, ultimately disprovable or not, it wouldn't matter, all the damage would be done.
Which is just another reason that I don't yet feel I have the option to respond to your message at your journal, or in a private message, as this crew works with all manner of tracking and hacking stuff, with a total disregard for either truth or consequences.
I'm sure you are smart enough to understand all of this, and therefore, should understand me as well - and so if you are for real, truthful, etc., then you'll stay. Which, in that case, I would really hope you would; if not, please understand, it's not a chance I can take.
And I like your name, too. A neighbor girl once made a pet rock for me with your name emblazoned on the back, in blue. I still have it.